
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
NEUESTE BEITRÄGE
- 1
The most effective method to Apply Antiquated Ways of thinking in Current Brain science Practices17.10.2023 - 2
Brazil passes anti-gang law allowing seized crypto to fund security forces28.03.2026 - 3
Warnings rise for U.S. as severe flu strain causes outbreaks in Canada, U.K.12.11.2025 - 4
Surge of off‑lease electric vehicles expected to drive down used EV prices26.03.2026 - 5
Vote in favor of Your Number one Cake Type05.06.2024
Ähnliche Artikel
7 Powerful Techniques to Boost Efficiency with Your Cell Phone: A Thorough Aide30.06.2023
5 Must-Attempt Fascinating Dishes from Around the World01.01.1
Share your pick for the tree that you love for its novel magnificence!06.06.2024
How a cocktail of rogue storms and climate chaos unleashed deadly flooding across Asia05.12.2025
5 State of the art Advancements in Computer generated Simulation10.08.2023
Am I a Summer, or is this a scam? What I learned from color analysis.30.03.2026
Mojtaba Khamenei unconscious in Qom, not actually running Iran07.04.2026
Moon memorial: Artemis 2 astronauts name lunar 'bright spot' after mission commander's late wife06.04.2026
Why the Houthis waited until now to strike28.03.2026
Abbott issues US device correction for some glucose monitors over faulty readings risk24.11.2025














