
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
NEUESTE BEITRÄGE
- 1
Why the weirdest sea level changes on Earth are happening off the coast of Japan22.12.2025 - 2
Cocoa Prices Undercut Amid the Prospects of Abundant Supplies19.12.2025 - 3
Parents speak out as 4-year-old fights button battery injury in intensive care unit25.03.2026 - 4
Mars orbiter sees 'butterfly' crater spread its wings on the Red Planet05.12.2025 - 5
Sally Rooney books may be withdrawn from UK sale over Palestine Action ban, court told27.11.2025
Ähnliche Artikel
Undeniably popular Historical centers: Where Craftsmanship and History Meet06.06.2024
Figure out How to Adjust Your Handshake to Various Societies19.10.2023
FDA approves Wegovy pill for weight loss: What to know23.12.2025
5 Wellbeing Applications Assist You With remaining Fit01.01.1
Commonsense Ways to work on Your Funds with a Restricted Pay30.06.2023
Washington resident is infected with a different type of bird flu14.11.2025
US FDA panel to weigh bid to market nicotine pouches as lower-risk than cigarettes21.11.2025
Old age isn’t a modern phenomenon – many people lived long enough to grow old in the olden days, too29.03.2026
Argentina reportedly delaying embassy move over Israeli company's oil project near Falklands11.01.2026
RFK Jr. says he's following 'gold standard' science. Here's what to know22.11.2025














